Brad H. v. City of New York
The Urban Justice Center filed this class action lawsuit in 1999, challenging New York City's practice of discharging people with psychiatric disabilities from the city jails in the middle of the night with only $1.50 and two tokens, and without any psychiatric medication or referral to services. In 2003, the parties settled the case with an agreement that the City would provide the 15,000 people who receive psychiatric treatment in city jails each year with discharge planning services, including continued mental health care, case management, and assistance in accessing public benefits and housing.
Because the City has failed to comply with the settlement agreement, the Urban Justice Center sought an order from the court extending the agreement for another two years. In July 2009, Judge Marilyn Shafer of the New York State Supreme Court ordered the City to continue to comply with the agreement while the Plaintiffs' motion is litigated. The City appealed that decision. On June 28, 2011, the New York State Court of Appeals reinstated Judge Shafer’s decision, which had been overturned at the Appellate Division, and allowed litigation to proceed on whether the 2003 settlement can be extended an additional two years.
On August 12, 2011, we reinstated our motion to enforce the settlement, requesting not only a two-year extension but also an order that the City modify its failed policies which have prevented the City from complying with its obligations. Click here to read the Memorandum of Law.
Pro bono co-counsel: Debevoise & Plimpton
Co-counsel: New York Lawyers for the Public Interest
-
Read the Settlement
-
Read the Complaint
-
Read the Amicus Brief
-
Special Report of the Compliance Monitors, November 17, 2003
-
Second Quarterly Report of the Compliance Monitors, December 16, 2003
-
Third Quarterly Report of the Compliance Monitors, March 8, 2004
-
Fourth Quarterly Report of the Compliance Monitors, June 7, 2004
-
Fourth Quarterly Report: Appendix 1
-
Fourth Quarterly Report: Appendix 3
-
Fourth Quarterly Report: Appendix 4
-
Fourth Quarterly Report: Appendix 6
-
Fifth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, October 13, 2004
-
Fifth Regular Report: Appendix 4
-
Sixth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, February 7, 2005
-
Seventh Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, June 6, 2005
-
Eighth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, October 6, 2005
-
Ninth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, February 6, 2006
-
Appelate Division First Department Appeal, October 3, 2006
-
Eleventh Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, October 6, 2006
-
Twelfth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, February 6, 2007
-
Thirteenth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, June 6, 2007
-
Fourteenth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, December 4, 2008
-
Fifteenth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, February 6, 2009
-
Special Report of the Compliance Monitors, April 24, 2009
-
Sixteenth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, June 18, 2009
-
Seventeenth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, December 2, 2009
-
Eighteenth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, July 6, 2010
-
Nineteenth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, November 8, 2010
-
Twentieth Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, June 6, 2011
-
Twenty-First Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors, October 6, 2011
-
Twenty-second Regular Report of the Compliance Monitors,
February 6, 2012.
Fourth Quarterly Report: Appendix 2